• 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 @pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    I was just at the store and walked by a display of flower seeds where I happened to notice one called “ferry-mouse” and I immediately thought of Steamboat Willie. Now I have the Baader-Meinhof cosmic algorithm showing me new content similar to what I was thinking about recently.

    This is proof that life is just a simulation.

  • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Sehr geehrter Herr Noerdman,

    gemäß des Übereinkommens zwischen dem Deutschen Reich und den Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika über den gegenseitigen Schutz der Urheberrechte vom 15. Januar 1892 erfahren US-amerikanische Werke die Inländerbehandlung in Deutschland. Folglich erlischt deren Urheberrecht nicht bereits 95 Jahre nach Erschaffung, sondern erst 70 Jahre nach Tod des am längsten lebenden Urhebers (§65 UrhG).

    Da Ub Iwerks, zweiter Regisseur und Urheber von „Steamboat Willie“, am 7. Juli 1971 verstarb, erlischt das Urheberrecht für dieses Werk in Deutschland erst am 1. Januar 2042.

    Bitte entfernen Sie diesen Beitrag somit umgehend, anderweitig können rechtliche Konsequenzen folgen.

    GaLiGrü
    Ihre The Walt Disney Company Germany GmbH

    • movies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      1 day ago

      The glove joke is that only Steamboat Willie is in the public domain. Wearing the gloves makes him Mickey Mouse, which is why he should absolutely not wear them as his copyright hasn’t expired.

      The other doors look like Donald Duck, Superman, and I guess James Bond? I assume their copyright expirations are coming soon—in that order.

    • Acamon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t really either. Mickey mouse is now PD, and I assume the other guy (no idea who he is) is too? And daffy duck, someone else and James bond will also become PD soon. Mickey with gloves is still copyrighted, so he can’t wear the gloves.

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        The other guy is the main character of the artist’s comic. He’s just visiting the land of public domain.

      • Burninator05@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        I wonder if other hand based clothing items are ok. White gloves clearly aren’t but what about different colored gloves? What about gauntlets? Inquiring minds want to know how far we can push this before legally we’re in the wrong.

        • RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Inquiring minds want to know how far we can push this before legally we’re in the wrong.

          As long as it’s parody like this comic, then you can do pretty much whatever you want. Like how Family Guy can reference 200 random things per episode. It’s only becomes illegal when it’s serious in nature, like fan made Star Trek stuff. Because it too closely resembles the actual show. If they could monetize stuff like that, they could theoretically become a Star Trek competitor.

          • Bgugi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Copyright law only really holds major rights holders accountable to each other. It doesn’t matter if you’re 100% in the right, if you piss off a rights holder enough they will crush you.

            See also CNN vs Canadian United Media.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    When Supes hits the public domain I’m inverting his character by making him MAGA. Fly the rot in everyone’s faces.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Except Homelander is different. You gotta make America feel like America is doing this by actually using their mascot. Also, Homelander didnt do any of those things in the comics, he was framed by Black Noir.

    • MudMan@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      24 hours ago

      You’re more likely to be sued by the thousands of people that have beaten you to that particular punch at that point.

      Amazon would probably be first in line, which is kinda weird if you think about it.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        24 hours ago

        Could you be sued once its public domain? Maybe for the other elements if it was again copyrighted based on those. I get Invincible, but it would feel different with actual superman, and not the one where he landed in Russia.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Yeah but it hasn’t been done where superman is just deporting all these people using his super speed, taking medicines from the cabinets of single African mothers using his flight. I think it would be effective in showing the effects of csncelling USAID and everything else the administration is doing. Hell, do it in golden age comic style for extra points as trump wants to return to that age but not do anything those presidents did.