The Trump administration is scrapping more than three dozen firearms regulations, abandoning a crackdown on illegal sales, restoring gun rights to some people with mental illness and loosening oversight of private weapons transactions.

The drastic retrenchment at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, the federal agency responsible for enforcing the nation’s gun laws, was not entirely unexpected: President Trump campaigned as a champion of gun rights.

In the view of critics and even some A.T.F. veterans, the agency, in closely mirroring the demands made by gun owners and manufacturers to lighten their regulatory burden, is enacting changes at the expense of public safety. The moves, they worry, come as the bureau has already been weakened, with hundreds of its officials diverted to immigration enforcement.

  • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    3 days ago

    scrapping more than three dozen firearms regulations

    I can’t stand how journalists will write something like that and then not include an itemized list.

    Yes, they give some examples, but I want the whole list without having to dig through the federal register myself.

    It matters because some of it is bad, while some is neutral, and some is good.

    I actually looked it up myself on the ATF’s website, which is actually really well set up.

    https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/atf-launches-new-era-reform

    There are only 4 rules that are being “scrapped”, and they aren’t even actually full rules being removed, just altered. 3 of them are to conform with court cases. The only 1 they are removing on their own is a rule that was meant to be temporary to inform people of a rule change back in the 90’s (making pistols only 21+). Since that change is 30 years old, now, it isnt new, so there’s no need to pretend it is.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      There are only 4 rules that are being “scrapped”,

      Given the massive gulf between that, and the 36 mentioned in the article, I have to wonder if you’re missing a chunk of data

      • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        They list all 36 things, but the majority of them are basically clerical updates, like removing the requirement for forms to be submitted in triplicate because copy machines (and scanners) exist.

        Also, making bootleg vape cartridges get treated the same way as bootleg cigarettes.

        Most of the changes (and I read through all of them) are mostly neutral updates that are more about clarifying policies and updating stuff thats outdated. There is some negative stuff, like adhering to the “gender ideology” executive order on forms.

        Despite what republicans claim, Trump isnt really a gun rights guy. In fact, one of the rules being scrapped is his rule against bump stocks from his first term, because it was ruled against by the courts.

      • RattlerSix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yeah, The first sentence on the atf website says “ATF launched a new era of reform in 2025…” and the rest of the page is listing the “new era actions taken.”

        It does say it was updated in May 2026, which is somewhat recent, but there’s nothing that indicates this page is listing everything they’re currently doing.

        • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          All changes will be in the federal register, so if there is anything missing from the page, you could find it in the register without much trouble.

  • Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Maybe he thinks there are too many Americans sharing the wealth?
    He has tried to reduce the share of the poor and middle class, but this is way more efficient.
    Kind of like an endlösung, but way more elegant to just have people kill each other.

  • darthsundhaft@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think he’s deserving a demonstration of what he’s choosing to prioritize in the same way Charlie Kirk was shown. Please, someone, show him.

  • KelvarCherry [They/Them]@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    “restoring gun rights to some people with mental illness” is good actually. We should never tolerate the “othering” of folks by the state; especially when that state is the USA.

    • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      If you read the proposed change, basically it comes down to the fact that the ATF took the definition of “mentally defective” from other government sources, specifically, Veterans Affairs.

      That definition includes people, for example, who are incapable of managing their own finances, but have no other indications of being a danger to themselves or others.

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      While I see your point, 60% of gun deaths are suicides. We absolutely need to do something and since universal healthcare is not happening with this administration, a gun ban might be the only thing that could help.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago
        1. We need to do something!
        2. ‘This’ is ‘something’
        3. Therefore, we must do ‘this’

        I realize you attempted to justify it by hand-waving away a better alternative, but still, that logic is bullshit.

      • P00ptart@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        And who are you to take away someone’s options if they want to opt out? Tell a health professional, and you’ll be jumping through so many hoops it’ll make you want to even more. It’s rather authoritarian of you to say people aren’t allowed to make the choice themselves. Besides, although free therapy would help, it wouldn’t eliminate suicide altogether.

        • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I support euthanasia for people who choose it with a clear mind. We are talking about people who would not choose suicide if they were properly treated by and large.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s rich seeing all of the 2a, “it’s a mental health issue” people tripping over themselves to defend this shit.

        • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m generally pro gun, but if you regularly hallucinate an 8 foot rabbit telling you the McDonalds drive through guy is a secret alien, you shouldn’t have a fucking gun.