• Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Remember the time when railroaders went on strike because they wanted to be treated like pigs?

    Because pigs were treated better than railroaders. Pigs were valuable freight and deserved a long rest after being on a train for 12 hours. No similar regulation existed for the people who ran a train…

  • KeavesSharpi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    This will totally fix the diesel price problem. This country is more cooked than the planet itself.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Need to have a little something left over for the lot lizards.

        I was curious and looked up what you can drive in the UK/EU. It’s 9 hours. Twice a week you can push it to 10.

    • Skysurfer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      No worries, we can just fly everywhere. Wait, what’s that, they just put AI in charge of air traffic control? Okay, yeah, we’re doomed.

    • nullspace@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Well, it’s one way to boost sales on the gas-guzzling, rolling tanks the US auto makers refuse to diversify away from.

      • DaveyRocket@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        4 days ago

        After being unable to convince anyone of anything that was going to happen and change even one mind, my only joy is watching them suffer the results of their shitty choices. My next high is scheduled for next year when everyone scratches their head on why the governemt needs to double the national deficit to bail out Dario and Sam.

        • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Now that’s no reason to give up. After COVID hit, I had a coworker that was anti-vaccine, and she talked to me about it, because she assumed I was as well. I had mentioned something about how whenever I accidentally drop food on the floor, I eat it as a challenge to my immune system. She expected that that thought carried over to vaccine hesitancy. I later sent her an e-mail telling her that my trick of challenging my immune system, was exactly what vaccines were. Then dove into what vaccines actually are and how they work. She later thanked me, and said that I helped her and her husband finally go and get their shots. It was real cool.

          So, sometimes, if you approach it the right way, you can still change peoples minds.

          Not like I’m an expert though, I’m still running into a brick wall of willful ignorance every time I try to engage with my trump loving parents 🙄

          • DaveyRocket@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            Here’s the thing, Fox News outspends me all the money to none. I just don’t have a shot in hell. Also, I’m the one that has to think up factual arguments while the other side is comfortable screaming crazy racist shit if they think no one is looking. I’d rather talk to allies and push them to greater action than waste another minute detangling the conservative mind.

    • FundMECFS@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      We’ve got to remove private monopolies on rail lines so freight rail can be used efficiently as a major alternative to trucking.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      Fun fact: it’s definitely not going to slow. It’s about to get even worse. Unless of course the government decides to subsidize the hell out of diesel to make it cheaper.

    • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Not to worry. We can always increase the limit to 24 hours per day, and make them drag the trailers with bicycles.

    • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      4 days ago

      As a non-American, I find it baffling and hilarious that many Americans are proud to work 80 hours a week. It’s not a flex. They’d regret having done so when they become too frail and forgetful at the old age. And all the money they saved and pension being collected will be spent on healthcare and medication instead.

      They did not even live their life when they were young and they won’t even enjoy the remainder.

      • ElChinchilla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        Jokes on you, I’m young(ish) and not enjoying it already. Haven’t been enjoying it since about 2002.

          • mrmisses@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            The dumber the better propaganda works. And Americans are dumb as shit. Don’t believe me, look who is president for the second time

            • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              3 days ago

              Americans are no dumber than any other demographic. They have, however, been subject to a century-long propaganda campaign to instill subservience to capitalist ideology while those same capitalists have been dismantling any educational system or media outlet that might break that subservience.

              Beware of the “Americans dumb” rhetoric, because a false sense of superiority is the exact thing that led Americans to accept the propaganda. It can happen to your country, too (and probably is happening, to be real).

              • DillDough@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                3 days ago

                50% of US citizens read at 5th grade level or lower. This doesn’t sound too terrible until you remember that those tests are actually comprehension tests. Majority of us have less comprehensive abilities than we expect out of children, and this was before the “ai” boom, you know it’s gotten exponentially worse already and will continue to decline at an ever accelerating pace. We genuinely are some of the dumbest motherfuckers our species has to offer.

                • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  I guess I’m distinguishing between innately dumb and dumb-by-design. Poor reading comprehension is a result of the intentional dismantling of our education system. It’s not the people’s fault, it’s the capitalists.

          • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            Chinese have legally defined retirement ages close to Europe, so even if they have high working hours comparable to the US at least they don’t have to work until death.

            • Bluewing@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              The US has legally defined retirement ages too. And if you plan, I know malice afore thought isn’t your strong suit, you can have a decent retirement also.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        apparently in academia, they think its a flex for PI to be working that much, granted the competitive to be hired at 4-year is pretty high.

  • Maestro@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    139
    ·
    4 days ago

    Even the original 14 is horrible. Here it’s 9-10 hours per day max, with a cap of 56 hours per week.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    ·
    4 days ago

    If you’re driving 16 hours a day, then your cargo should probably be going by rail.

    • EvacuateSoul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 days ago

      Well this is fuel hauling, so multiple stops or loads in a day to service stations. Even if they had rail service set up at the gas station for delivery, rail companies in the US hate small customers like that these days.

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        4 days ago

        Just a couple of years ago in my neighborhood a truck driver was arrested because he offloaded 4000 gallons of gasoline at a gas station, then ran the hose down an embankment next to the station and pumped the remaining 8000 gallons into a creek. He did this because he wanted to go home and didn’t feel like making the rest of his stops. He apparently thought nobody would notice; for bonus points this was right next to a charter school which had to be evacuated while they cleaned up the mess.

        He was arrested and sentenced to 20+ years in prison. This is the intelligence level that can get hired as a fuel truck driver (TBF I’m sure they’re not all that stupid).

        Edit: just for funsies, the gas station where this happened recently rebranded as a “Freedom Fuel” station lol.

        • tazeycrazy@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          I’ve herd of people dumping the news papers they had to deliver in order to say they diliverd them. But this is different. Doesn’t the guy need to get the invoice signed at every station?

          • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            3 days ago

            I think his strategy was to tell his bosses he had run out of fuel and wouldn’t be able to make the rest of his deliveries. But I dunno, the articles about this never said what his thought process was. I drive past this station twice a day and the stink from it was horrible. 8000 gallons is a lot of fucking gas.

            This reminds me that years ago I was friends with a bunch of Red Bull girls. Their job was to pick up the Red Bull mini-cooper, fill it with cases of Red Bull and then drive around handing out free samples wherever people were while being attractive. They were very good at the being attractive part, but most days they would just drive to the river, dump the cases of Red Bull in it, and then go home and get high. Their bosses suspected something like this was going on and gave them all Windows Mobile PDAs that tracked their location by GPS. I checked out the tracking app (I was a Windows Mobile developer at the time) and it turned out it just logged their GPS coordinates once an hour into a plain text file. I showed them how to edit the file to make it look like they were driving around – just doing my part saving at least some people from trying fucking Red Bull.

      • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Hm now I’m wondering how the volumes compare, between what one truck carries and how much one gas station stores.

        I just noticed I have no idea how large those burried tanks are.

      • tazeycrazy@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        The only way this would be more efficient would for direct piping but this would be less efficient as you would need to create a network and not all stations would want to sign up. The airports in the UK operat this but this was so it’s harder to cut supplies off to airports as they are critical infrastructure.

      • MrEff@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        4 days ago

        It was made expensive by letting the oil companies force regulatory capture on it, then tear up all the rails they let could. There were more rails in the US 100 years ago then there are today. Adding stops didn’t take years when there were already rails near by to branch off of. The only reason adding stops is so hard now it because the cut down lines.

          • MrEff@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 days ago

            One train stop (utility freight, not passanger) is much larger, sure. But how many tons does it process compared to an 18-wheeler? Then, in high density urban centers where you have passenger trains, they normally put them underground. Meaning, the only “land” they take up is about the size of 2 pumps, without the accompanying convenient store. Meanwhile, they remove thousands of cars off the road per day.

            It is unquestionably more efficient to run more trains for both freight or passenger. That is why oil and gas hate it. So they buy-in and stack the boards of the rail companies, beg congress for more “regulation and safety”, and cripple expansion with mandatory oversight comittees to slow down whatever gets through. All classic plays.

            • LwL@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              I think you’re missing the context where this is about resupplying gasoline to fuel stations. So the highway infrastructure is already there and you don’t gain anything by shipping a large load to a central place.

              Tbh though if a rail line was built parallel to the road, it doesn’t seem prohibitively expensive to build a pump that can get the gas from a train. Though probably still not financially sensible for the gas station without subsidies or something.

      • hissing meerkat@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Rail can add and remove heavy rail temporary sidings in a matter of hours. When rail was the only powered freight option agricultural sidings would be put down to collect produce in a small area, then picked up and moved down the tracks a couple of miles, rinse and repeat. There are places in the world right now where narrow gauge light rail is placed into fields to collect produce, and picked up and moved multiple times for the same field.

  • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 days ago

    A very rich man hundreds or thousands of miles away accepts the risks to other peoples lives as a great deal.

  • liking625@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    Just that? I am sure true republicans can afford to do much more for the country, why not 24, or double that, 48! Hail Trump!

    • altphoto@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      Trump is doing something Algore could only have wet dreams about… Trump is ending the Diesel and internal combustion engine (poorly planned acronymy). He might not like it but as soon as he is out and all the refineries are in shambles something has to replace all that. Probably hydrogen, and battery powered vehicles.

      • 13igtyme@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        Toyota tried hydrogen years ago and it didn’t really catch on. If the global gas economy crashes, I know a lot of locations they could use as hydrogen fuel pumps.

        • CrimeIsLegalNow@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          It didn’t catch on because it’s stupid on multiple levels, from infrastructure engineering to realpolitik. Japan as a nation is just desperate for energy independence and pretending the hydrogen will be sourced from the expensive electrolysis and not cheap natural gas refinement was a way to get free government money.

          They convinced themselves that all the petrostates, which includes America and Russia, would just abandon their current economic advantage to pay them billions of dollars to rebuild their entire vehicle fuel infrastructure, since they would be the industry leaders and the only major source of engineering knowhow.

          • altphoto@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 days ago

            Well I’d like to add that Ford did too indirectly and it works. I personally rode both a fuel cell bus and one with a Ford Hydrogen combustion engine and both worked wonderfully. The hydrogen was sourced from electrolysis at a wind turbine. It was a proof of concept. And most relevantly… Toyota is at this again. It actually never quit because it is a smart move. Hydrogen can be easily had from natural gas or water and natural gas or oil is already the normal fuel. So you start at normal, then you switch when normal is gone. It’s expensive but let’s remember, Japan is an island with no oil deposits and a ton of smart people. Ofcourse they would try to figure it out.

            • Jiral@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              It is perfectly functional but it is not clever, unless batteries, even LFP ones, that need no rare resources, are absolutely no option for whatever reason (we are talking about a factor of two more energy needed for doing the same as something battery powered). Hydrogen simply is much more inefficient over the whole cycle, no matter what you do, because of fundamental physics. Smart people can’t rewrite those.

              In Europe even the last hold outs and former champions of that technology are realising that.

              • altphoto@lemmy.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Let’s say that the goal is to move cars around without polluting and that you have a sun, a planet with wind, water streams, waves and with radioactive materials that can be fused or fissed. But no oil because that pollutes.

                • Jiral@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Sure, but if you need twice the energy for doing the same, that creates a larger CO2 footprint and higher resource demand (ie also more pollution) than the more efficient alternative, even if everything is based on renewable energies. But that is maybe too theoretical, more practical is the issue that the inefficient technology will struggle to become competitive.

        • altphoto@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          It doesn’t matter. What matters is the guy is tamping and cramming all the bulls he can find into the oil business China shop when the rest of the world leads in clean energy. When the dust settles, my guess is people will still be cold in winter and hot in summer and will still not care about where their energy comes from.

    • notsure@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      …it might be a new benefit in hiring, we’ll compensate a per centage of your fuel costs…after two months…and we’ve earned interest on it…follow my rabbit hole for further financial advice…/s?

      • Sunflier@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Then the industry practice will be to force all the truckers with than benefit after 1 month, 3 weeks, 6 days so they don’t have to pay it.

        • notsure@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          …you must be a graduate of my FAMILY accounting course, any problems with that?..menaces

  • waterwasamistake@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is crazy where i live its 9 hours manditory rest of 45 min after 4,5 hours maximum of 56 per week maximum 90 per 2 weeks. And manditory rest of 11 hours between shifts, we are still well suplied there is zero need for 14 hour shifts 12 is already crazy.

  • veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Ah yes, because we know Precision Scheduled Railroading with the freight train industry has worked so well, let’s legislate the means by which we can employ less of the already overworked staff under the guise of optimization, when in reality it’s yet another way to funnel even more money towards the top.