BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · 10 days agoLets give killer drones to the AI, what could go wrong?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square19linkfedilinkarrow-up1150 cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1150imageLets give killer drones to the AI, what could go wrong?lemmy.worldBeatTakeshi@lemmy.world to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · 10 days agomessage-square19linkfedilink cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareKeeponstalin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·10 days agoThis is AI designed for plausible deniability of targeting civilians. Tested in Gaza with the Lavender and Where’s Daddy AI systems
minus-squarequick_snail@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up5·10 days agoNo. WSJ reported that Claude was used in both Venezuela and determining targets in Iran. The reason Hegseth declared it a supply chain risk was because Anthropic refused to allow it to be used in autonomous wrapons.
minus-squaretechnocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 days ago in both Venezuela For kidnapping that bus driver? determining targets in Iran. You mean murdering school girls? Yeah, that sounds like the same old technology under capitalism. No “AI” detected.
minus-squaretechnocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 days agoTo be fair, “AI” is a nonexistent grift. Whether autopilot or autocomplete, it’s the same old shit just regrifted.
deleted by creator
This is AI designed for plausible deniability of targeting civilians. Tested in Gaza with the Lavender and Where’s Daddy AI systems
No. WSJ reported that Claude was used in both Venezuela and determining targets in Iran.
The reason Hegseth declared it a supply chain risk was because Anthropic refused to allow it to be used in autonomous wrapons.
For kidnapping that bus driver?
You mean murdering school girls?
Yeah, that sounds like the same old technology under capitalism. No “AI” detected.
To be fair, “AI” is a nonexistent grift.
Whether autopilot or autocomplete, it’s the same old shit just regrifted.