BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · 2 months agoLets give killer drones to the AI, what could go wrong?lemmy.worldimagemessage-square19linkfedilinkarrow-up1150 cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1150imageLets give killer drones to the AI, what could go wrong?lemmy.worldBeatTakeshi@lemmy.world to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square19linkfedilink cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareKeeponstalin@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 months agoThis is AI designed for plausible deniability of targeting civilians. Tested in Gaza with the Lavender and Where’s Daddy AI systems
minus-squarequick_snail@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 months agoNo. WSJ reported that Claude was used in both Venezuela and determining targets in Iran. The reason Hegseth declared it a supply chain risk was because Anthropic refused to allow it to be used in autonomous wrapons.
minus-squaretechnocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months ago in both Venezuela For kidnapping that bus driver? determining targets in Iran. You mean murdering school girls? Yeah, that sounds like the same old technology under capitalism. No “AI” detected.
minus-squaretechnocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoTo be fair, “AI” is a nonexistent grift. Whether autopilot or autocomplete, it’s the same old shit just regrifted.
deleted by creator
This is AI designed for plausible deniability of targeting civilians. Tested in Gaza with the Lavender and Where’s Daddy AI systems
No. WSJ reported that Claude was used in both Venezuela and determining targets in Iran.
The reason Hegseth declared it a supply chain risk was because Anthropic refused to allow it to be used in autonomous wrapons.
For kidnapping that bus driver?
You mean murdering school girls?
Yeah, that sounds like the same old technology under capitalism. No “AI” detected.
To be fair, “AI” is a nonexistent grift.
Whether autopilot or autocomplete, it’s the same old shit just regrifted.