Archived link

Yesterday, the West Virginia House of Delegates approved an amendment from Del. J.B. Akers ® to allow a child’s “treating health care provider” to examine a child’s genitals without the consent of their parents.

The amendment was actually an improvement over a previous version of the bill, which, state Democrats argued, would have allowed teachers to perform the genital examinations.

Akers’ amendment was the Republican response to one proposed by Del. Kayla Young (D), which would have banned child and adult genital examinations altogether.

“It’s unconscionable that Republicans would support legislation that authorizes intrusive visual inspections of minors without parental approval,” Young said. “West Virginians should be alarmed and disgusted by this invasion of privacy.”

It also says that all intersex people are “either male or female” but does not give a basis for assigning a sex to them.

  • thingAmaBob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    So wait… Couldn’t they just simply request a copy of a child’s yearly physical from their physician? For example, in the 90s/2000s, if we wanted to join a sport we had to get a physical from our GP of choice so the doctor can confirm it was safe for us to play the sport in question. It was a form the doctor and parent filled out, then gave to the school. I would think something like that was already a thing?? I also remember my parents having to submit certain medical records to my schools for other reasons… Why would anyone else need to examine these children???

    • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ideally, if the politicians actually believed what they told their votes, then yes, they would do it that way. But… Trump was best friends with Jeffry Epstein. Nearly all the Maga billionaires visited Epstein’s island. The Republican party is full of pedos, sex traffickers and Nazis.

  • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    What level are they allowed to view? If the child says no are they able to force their way into their pants? At what point does it become rape?

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      145
      ·
      3 days ago

      A child cannot consent.

      So, immediately. It becomes sexual assault, at least, immediately.

      • Deello@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        3 days ago

        You’re looking at this problem all wrong, it’s not that children cannot consent. Nobody is arguing that. The change here is that now those that would be doing the tests are no longer considered child predators because they didn’t do anything illegal. So now it would be totally fine for priests, doctors, senators, neighbors, etc to look at random kids genitals to verify sexuality without any resistance from their parents/guardians. Is this how we finally do away with rapists, by redefining sexual assault.

        • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 days ago

          So now it would be totally fine for priests, doctors, senators, neighbors, etc

          “treating health care provider”

          Some of these things are not like the others.

          • Deello@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            After COVID, many doctors left rural areas. This has left many communities across the country lacking proper “treating health care providers”. Who do you think is going to fill that gap for the purpose of this bill. Besides, most of the time the ones that are making headlines for this stuff typically have an R next to their name. But you’re right, some of these things are not like the others. And that’s kinda my point.

      • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Unless…we can come up with some sort of legislation…totally important and necessary legislation, of course!

  • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    3 days ago

    Oh the irony that the shitheads that couldn’t wear a mask, and want to ban books because of “parent rights”, now want to ice parents out of the decision of a rando looking at their kids genitals.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 days ago

    We found the real freaks. I wonder if the Pizzagate/Qanon dipshits have figured it out yet: everything the qons do is about projection.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      If anything to go by their Hungarian counterparts, their only problem is “homosexual pedophilia”, while celebrate old guys who manage to hook up with actual teens as “real studs”, then blame the victims for the pedophilia, because “14 year olds back then played with dolls, not dressed like sluts”. And I was the one who felt bad for posting Railgun memes with “You know what are the number one causes of pedophilia? Sexy children” text onto my anime shitposting page…

  • Tempus Fugit@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    3 days ago

    This shouldn’t surprise anyone. Most pedophiles are Republicans. Now they get to visually molest your kids legally, neat.