- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
So pirating full works for commercial use suddenly is “fair use”, or what? Lets see what e.g. Disney says about this.
“We can’t succeed without breaking the law. We can’t succeed without operating unethically.”
I’m so sick of this bullshit. They pretend to love a free market until it’s not in their favor and then they ask us to bend over backwards for them.
Too many people think they’re superior. Which is ironic, because they’re also the ones asking for handouts and rule bending. If you were superior, you wouldn’t need all the unethical things that you’re asking for.
So pirating full works suddenly is fair use, or what?
Slave owners might go broke after abolition? 😂
I’m going to have to remember this
Gentlemen, this is democracy manifest!
What is the charge, officer? Eating a meal? A succulent Chinese meal?
Come on bro, let us pirate bro, just one more ngram of books bro
If everyone can ‘train’ themselves on copyrighted works, then I say "fair game.‘’
Otherwise, get fucked.
God forbid you offer to PAY for access to works that people create like everyone else has to. University students have to pay out the nose for their books that they “train” on, why can’t billion dollar AI companies?
Why does Sam keep threatening us with a good time?
Training that AI is absolutely fair use.
Selling that AI service that was trained on copyrighted material is absolutely not fair use.
Agreed… although I would go a step further and say distributing the LLM model or the results of use (even if done without cost) is not fair use, as the training materials weren’t licensed.
This sounds like socialism is good for capitalists
AI always been about using stolen stuff
Suddenly millions of people are downloading to “train their AI models”.
Then perish, OpenAI. If your only innovation is a legal loophole then you did nothing.