• Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    35 minutes ago

    So pirating full works for commercial use suddenly is “fair use”, or what? Lets see what e.g. Disney says about this.

  • rageagainstmachines@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    35 minutes ago

    “We can’t succeed without breaking the law. We can’t succeed without operating unethically.”

    I’m so sick of this bullshit. They pretend to love a free market until it’s not in their favor and then they ask us to bend over backwards for them.

    Too many people think they’re superior. Which is ironic, because they’re also the ones asking for handouts and rule bending. If you were superior, you wouldn’t need all the unethical things that you’re asking for.

  • sloppychops@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    33 minutes ago

    If everyone can ‘train’ themselves on copyrighted works, then I say "fair game.‘’

    Otherwise, get fucked.

  • stopforgettingit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    24 minutes ago

    God forbid you offer to PAY for access to works that people create like everyone else has to. University students have to pay out the nose for their books that they “train” on, why can’t billion dollar AI companies?

    • deltapi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      41 minutes ago

      Agreed… although I would go a step further and say distributing the LLM model or the results of use (even if done without cost) is not fair use, as the training materials weren’t licensed.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    20 minutes ago

    Then perish, OpenAI. If your only innovation is a legal loophole then you did nothing.